linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Improving udelay/ndelay on platforms where that is possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzy9=RtFRuJhFbF+PL_PCrkZsKtAKrq6WJo1z9eW9gLSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:44:20 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improving udelay/ndelay on platforms where that is possible

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Marc Gonzalez
<marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com> wrote:
>
> On arm32, it is possible to set up udelay() to be clock-based.

I'm not sure why this is discussed as some kind of generic problem.

Just do what x86-64 already does. We use the TSC, and ndelay() does
the right thing too.

I've not checked precision, but it should be close to the TSC update
frequency. So we're talking tens of megahertz.

Does it work on all PC's? No. It's only half-way reliable on the ones
where the TSC frequency doesn't change. So there are no *guarantees*.

               Linus