[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <150899557300.90597.9865127803541159465@resonance>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:26:13 +0200
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@...libre.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Quentin Schulz" <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] clk: add clk_rate_exclusive api
Hi Jerome,
Quoting Jerome Brunet (2017-09-24 22:00:29)
> @@ -1778,6 +1867,50 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_rate);
>
> /**
> + * clk_set_rate_exclusive - specify a new rate get exclusive control
> + * @clk: the clk whose rate is being changed
> + * @rate: the new rate for clk
> + *
> + * This is a combination of clk_set_rate() and clk_rate_exclusive_get()
> + * within a critical section
> + *
> + * This can be used initially to ensure that at least 1 consumer is
> + * statisfied when several consumers are competing for exclusivity over the
> + * same clock provider.
Please add the following here:
Calls to clk_rate_exclusive_get() should be balanced with calls to
clk_rate_exclusive_put().
Otherwise looks good to me.
Best regards,
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists