lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:32:09 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at, daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at,
        michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, luto@...nel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...gle.com,
        hughd@...gle.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/23] x86, kaiser: map espfix structures


We have some rather arcane code to help when we IRET to 16-bit
segments: the "espfix" code.  This consists of a few per-cpu
variables:

	espfix_stack: tells us where we allocated the stack
	  	      (the bottom)
	espfix_waddr: tells us where we can actually point %rsp

and the stack itself.  We need all three things mapped for this
to work.

Note: the espfix code runs with a kernel GSBASE, but user
(shadow) page tables.  We could switch to the kernel page tables
here and then not have to map any of this, but just
user-pagetable-mapping is simpler.  To switch over to the kernel
copy, we would need some temporary storage which is in short
supply at this point.

The original KAISER patch missed this case.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Moritz Lipp <moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at>
Cc: Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>
Cc: Michael Schwarz <michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
---

 b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c~kaiser-user-map-espfix arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c~kaiser-user-map-espfix	2017-10-31 15:03:55.601361577 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c	2017-10-31 15:03:55.605361766 -0700
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/init_task.h>
+#include <linux/kaiser.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
@@ -41,7 +42,6 @@
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/espfix.h>
-#include <asm/kaiser.h>
 
 /*
  * Note: we only need 6*8 = 48 bytes for the espfix stack, but round
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
 #define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO)
 
 /* This contains the *bottom* address of the espfix stack */
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_USER_MAPPED(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_USER_MAPPED(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
 
 /* Initialization mutex - should this be a spinlock? */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(espfix_init_mutex);
@@ -225,4 +225,5 @@ done:
 	per_cpu(espfix_stack, cpu) = addr;
 	per_cpu(espfix_waddr, cpu) = (unsigned long)stack_page
 				      + (addr & ~PAGE_MASK);
+	kaiser_add_mapping((unsigned long)stack_page, PAGE_SIZE, __PAGE_KERNEL);
 }
_

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ