[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLCkhhVmCbpxp4oWCgwCdkDQz2DsJnO=9EzfYZorNLMUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:45:48 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] x86, kaiser: do not set _PAGE_USER for init_mm page tables
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On 11/01/2017 02:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >>> The vsyscall page is _PAGE_USER and lives in init_mm via the fixmap.
>> >>
>> >> Groan, forgot about that abomination, but still there is no point in having
>> >> it marked PAGE_USER in the init_mm at all, kaiser or not.
>> >
>> > So shouldn't this patch effectively make the vsyscall page unusable?
>> > Any idea why that didn't show up in any of the x86 selftests?
>>
>> I actually think there may be two issues here:
>>
>> - vsyscall isn't even used much - if any - any more
>
> Only legacy user space uses it.
>
>> - the vsyscall emulation works fine without _PAGE_USER, since the
>> whole point is that we take a fault on it and then emulate.
>>
>> We do expose the vsyscall page read-only to user space in the
>> emulation case, but I'm not convinced that's even required.
>
> I don't see a reason why it needs to be mapped at all for emulation.
>
>> Nobody who configures KAISER enabled would possibly want to have the
>> actual native vsyscall page enabled. That would be an insane
>> combination.
>>
>> So the only possibly difference would be a user mode program that
>> actually looks at the vsyscall page, which sounds unlikely to be an
>> issue. It's legacy and not really used.
>
> Right, and we can either disable the NATIVE mode when KAISER is on or just
> rip the native mode out completely. Most distros have native mode disabled
> anyway, so you cannot even enable it on the kernel command line.
>
> I'm all for ripping it out or at least removing the config switch to enable
> native mode as a first step.
I would like to see NATIVE removed too.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists