lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:28:19 +0000 From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> > >> > >> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its > >> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during > >> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason. > >> > >> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have > >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime > >> suspend during system suspend. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Is this patch independent? > > It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also > depends on the PCI support for the flag. No problem. Which tree to you propose this goes through? > > For my own reference: > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists