linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171101.204658.787298649317439690.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 01 Nov 2017 20:46:58 +0900 (KST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     garsilva@...eddedor.com
Cc:     linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, wharms@....de,
        hal@...net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch
 fall-throughs

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:50:57 -0500

> The aim of this patchset is firstly to refactor code in nr_route.c in order to make it
> easier to read and maintain and, secondly, to mark some expected switch fall-throughs
> in preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> 
> I have to mention that I did not implement any unit test.
> If someone has any suggestions on how I could test this piece of code
> it'd be greatly appreciated.

Series applied, thank you.