[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30616b0c528248d3bc23bcb53311c1e2@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:45:08 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To: 'Juergen Gross' <jgross@...e.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] xen: support priv-mapping in an HVM tools domain
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Gross [mailto:jgross@...e.com]
> Sent: 01 November 2017 13:40
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>; x86@...nel.org; xen-
> devel@...ts.xenproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>; Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@...utronix.de>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>; H. Peter Anvin
> <hpa@...or.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: support priv-mapping in an HVM tools domain
>
> On 01/11/17 12:31, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > If the domain has XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap then use of the PV-
> > specific HYPERVISOR_mmu_update hypercall is clearly incorrect.
> >
> > This patch adds checks in xen_remap_domain_gfn_array() and
> > xen_unmap_domain_gfn_array() which call through to the approprate
> > xlate_mmu function if the feature is present.
> >
> > This patch also moves xen_remap_domain_gfn_range() into the PV-only
> MMU
> > code and #ifdefs the (only) calling code in privcmd accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > index 3e15345abfe7..01837c36e293 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > @@ -91,12 +91,12 @@ static int remap_area_mfn_pte_fn(pte_t *ptep,
> pgtable_t token,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int do_remap_gfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > - unsigned long addr,
> > - xen_pfn_t *gfn, int nr,
> > - int *err_ptr, pgprot_t prot,
> > - unsigned domid,
> > - struct page **pages)
> > +int xen_remap_gfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr,
> > + xen_pfn_t *gfn, int nr,
> > + int *err_ptr, pgprot_t prot,
> > + unsigned int domid,
> > + struct page **pages)
> > {
> > int err = 0;
> > struct remap_data rmd;
> > @@ -166,36 +166,34 @@ static int do_remap_gfn(struct vm_area_struct
> *vma,
> > return err < 0 ? err : mapped;
> > }
> >
> > -int xen_remap_domain_gfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > - unsigned long addr,
> > - xen_pfn_t gfn, int nr,
> > - pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid,
> > - struct page **pages)
> > -{
> > - return do_remap_gfn(vma, addr, &gfn, nr, NULL, prot, domid,
> pages);
> > -}
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_gfn_range);
> > -
> > int xen_remap_domain_gfn_array(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long addr,
> > xen_pfn_t *gfn, int nr,
> > int *err_ptr, pgprot_t prot,
> > unsigned domid, struct page **pages)
> > {
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array(vma, addr, gfn, nr,
> err_ptr,
> > + prot, domid, pages);
> > +
> > /* We BUG_ON because it's a programmer error to pass a NULL
> err_ptr,
> > * and the consequences later is quite hard to detect what the actual
> > * cause of "wrong memory was mapped in".
> > */
> > BUG_ON(err_ptr == NULL);
> > - return do_remap_gfn(vma, addr, gfn, nr, err_ptr, prot, domid,
> pages);
> > + return xen_remap_gfn(vma, addr, gfn, nr, err_ptr, prot, domid,
> > + pages);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_gfn_array);
> >
> > /* Returns: 0 success */
> > int xen_unmap_domain_gfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > - int numpgs, struct page **pages)
> > + int nr, struct page **pages)
> > {
> > - if (!pages || !xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return xen_xlate_unmap_gfn_range(vma, nr, pages);
> > +
> > + if (!pages)
> > return 0;
> >
> > return -EINVAL;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> > index 71495f1a86d7..4974d8a6c2b4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> > @@ -2670,3 +2670,14 @@ phys_addr_t paddr_vmcoreinfo_note(void)
> > return __pa(vmcoreinfo_note);
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> > +
> > +int xen_remap_domain_gfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr,
> > + xen_pfn_t gfn, int nr,
> > + pgprot_t prot, unsigned int domid,
> > + struct page **pages)
> > +{
> > + return xen_remap_gfn(vma, addr, &gfn, nr, NULL, prot, domid,
> > + pages);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_gfn_range);
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > index feca75b07fdd..b58a1719b606 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > @@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static int traverse_pages_block(unsigned nelem,
> size_t size,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV
> > +
> > struct mmap_gfn_state {
> > unsigned long va;
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > @@ -261,10 +263,6 @@ static long privcmd_ioctl_mmap(struct file *file,
> void __user *udata)
> > LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
> > struct mmap_gfn_state state;
> >
> > - /* We only support privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch for auto translated.
> */
> > - if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > - return -ENOSYS;
> > -
>
> CONFIG_XEN_PV doesn't mean we don't support running as HVM guest.
>
> I don't think you can remove this test, nor do I think it makes sense
> to put privcmd_ioctl_mmap() inside an #ifdef.
Ok, I can leave the test in, but I only put the function inside the ifdef at Boris's request (unless I misinterpreted what he meant).
>
> You should rather add something like privcmd_ioctl_mmap_pv() with all
> the PV-specific functionality and call this here. For !CONFIG_XEN_PV
> it can e.g. just BUG().
>
Personally, I prefer my original patch where all the changes were kept inside mmu.c. It was much neater.
Paul
>
> Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists