[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59F9E12E.4030302@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 14:58:54 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/6] Switch GHES ioremap_page_range() to use fixmap
Hi Linus,
On 31/10/17 15:52, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:38 AM, James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
>> 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
> Lovely.
>
> I obviously can't test it, but it looks fine. I *would* suggest just
> making the "add fixmap entries" commits with the code that actually
> uses them. There's no real reason to have two commits that just add
> two entries that aren't used yet.
>
> If it was some meaningful helper function where a split of the commits
> makes each commit easier to read, that would be one thing. As it is,
> the split just makes it harder to look at the history of the code (ie
> "I wonder where this was introduced - let's use 'git blame'. Oh,
> that's not useful").
I will squash the first three patches together to fix this, and add something
about HAVE_ACPI_APEI to the commit message.
(I'm still holding out for someone to test this on an x86 system with NOTIFY_NMI)
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists