[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171101151803.GB31285@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:18:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Backlund <tmb@...eia.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 28/43] SMB3: Validate negotiate request must always
be signed
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:02:11PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Den 31.10.2017 kl. 11:55, skrev Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > 4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
> >
> > commit 4587eee04e2ac7ac3ac9fa2bc164fb6e548f99cd upstream.
> >
> > According to MS-SMB2 3.2.55 validate_negotiate request must
> > always be signed. Some Windows can fail the request if you send it unsigned
> >
> > See kernel bugzilla bug 197311
> >
> > Acked-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber.redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > ---
> > fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
> > @@ -1963,6 +1963,9 @@ SMB2_ioctl(const unsigned int xid, struc
> > } else
> > iov[0].iov_len = get_rfc1002_length(req) + 4;
> > + /* validate negotiate request must be signed - see MS-SMB2 3.2.5.5 */
> > + if (opcode == FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO)
> > + req->hdr.sync_hdr.Flags |= SMB2_FLAGS_SIGNED;
> > rc = SendReceive2(xid, ses, iov, n_iov, &resp_buftype, flags, &rsp_iov);
> > cifs_small_buf_release(req);
> >
> >
> >
>
> This one needs to be backported to all stable kernels as the commit that
> introduced the regression:
> '
> 0603c96f3af50e2f9299fa410c224ab1d465e0f9
> SMB: Validate negotiate (to protect against downgrade) even if signing off
>
> is backported in stable trees as of: 4.9.53, 4.4.90, 3.18.73
Oh wait, it breaks the builds on older kernels, that's why I didn't
apply it :)
Can you provide me with a working backport?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists