[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171101160137.GA11038@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:01:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] usb: host: isp1362-hcd: mark expected switch
fall-through
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 02:05:05PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Quoting "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>:
>
> > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> > where we are expecting to fall through.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
> > index 9b7e307..753d576 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
> > @@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ static int isp1362_hub_control(struct usb_hcd
> > *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&isp1362_hcd->lock, flags);
> > isp1362_write_reg32(isp1362_hcd, HCRHSTATUS, RH_HS_OCIC);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&isp1362_hcd->lock, flags);
> > + /* fall through */
>
> I'm suspicious this should be a 'break' instead.
>
> What do you think?
Yeah, this should be a 'break', care to make that patch up instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists