| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171101164754.xzzmskl4ngrqc5br@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:47:54 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jeremy Cline <jcline@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 07:56:20AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Did these get queued up somewhere? I know last week was OSSEU/Ksummit
> so people may still be playing catch-up.
Ah, thanks for the reminder.
/me goes and dusts it off.
Ok, here it is, injecting some MCEs in a guest seems to work fine,
mcelog logs them.
Tony?
---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:49:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mcelog: Get rid of RCU remnants
/dev/mcelog is called in process context now as part of the notifier
chain and doesn't need any of the fancy RCU and lockless accesses which
it did in atomic context.
Axe it all in favor of a simple mutex synchronization.
Reported-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498969
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/dev-mcelog.c | 121 +++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/dev-mcelog.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/dev-mcelog.c
index 10cec43aac38..7f85b76f43bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/dev-mcelog.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/dev-mcelog.c
@@ -24,14 +24,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(mce_chrdev_read_mutex);
static char mce_helper[128];
static char *mce_helper_argv[2] = { mce_helper, NULL };
-#define mce_log_get_idx_check(p) \
-({ \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex), \
- "suspicious mce_log_get_idx_check() usage"); \
- smp_load_acquire(&(p)); \
-})
-
/*
* Lockless MCE logging infrastructure.
* This avoids deadlocks on printk locks without having to break locks. Also
@@ -53,43 +45,32 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
void *data)
{
struct mce *mce = (struct mce *)data;
- unsigned int next, entry;
-
- wmb();
- for (;;) {
- entry = mce_log_get_idx_check(mcelog.next);
- for (;;) {
-
- /*
- * When the buffer fills up discard new entries.
- * Assume that the earlier errors are the more
- * interesting ones:
- */
- if (entry >= MCE_LOG_LEN) {
- set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW,
- (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags);
- return NOTIFY_OK;
- }
- /* Old left over entry. Skip: */
- if (mcelog.entry[entry].finished) {
- entry++;
- continue;
- }
- break;
- }
- smp_rmb();
- next = entry + 1;
- if (cmpxchg(&mcelog.next, entry, next) == entry)
- break;
+ unsigned int entry;
+
+ mutex_lock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex);
+
+ entry = mcelog.next;
+
+ /*
+ * When the buffer fills up discard new entries. Assume that the
+ * earlier errors are the more interesting ones:
+ */
+ if (entry >= MCE_LOG_LEN) {
+ set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags);
+ goto unlock;
}
+
+ mcelog.next = entry + 1;
+
memcpy(mcelog.entry + entry, mce, sizeof(struct mce));
- wmb();
mcelog.entry[entry].finished = 1;
- wmb();
/* wake processes polling /dev/mcelog */
wake_up_interruptible(&mce_chrdev_wait);
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex);
+
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
@@ -177,13 +158,6 @@ static int mce_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return 0;
}
-static void collect_tscs(void *data)
-{
- unsigned long *cpu_tsc = (unsigned long *)data;
-
- cpu_tsc[smp_processor_id()] = rdtsc();
-}
-
static int mce_apei_read_done;
/* Collect MCE record of previous boot in persistent storage via APEI ERST. */
@@ -231,14 +205,9 @@ static ssize_t mce_chrdev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
size_t usize, loff_t *off)
{
char __user *buf = ubuf;
- unsigned long *cpu_tsc;
- unsigned prev, next;
+ unsigned next;
int i, err;
- cpu_tsc = kmalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!cpu_tsc)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
mutex_lock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex);
if (!mce_apei_read_done) {
@@ -247,65 +216,29 @@ static ssize_t mce_chrdev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
goto out;
}
- next = mce_log_get_idx_check(mcelog.next);
-
/* Only supports full reads right now */
err = -EINVAL;
if (*off != 0 || usize < MCE_LOG_LEN*sizeof(struct mce))
goto out;
+ next = mcelog.next;
err = 0;
- prev = 0;
- do {
- for (i = prev; i < next; i++) {
- unsigned long start = jiffies;
- struct mce *m = &mcelog.entry[i];
-
- while (!m->finished) {
- if (time_after_eq(jiffies, start + 2)) {
- memset(m, 0, sizeof(*m));
- goto timeout;
- }
- cpu_relax();
- }
- smp_rmb();
- err |= copy_to_user(buf, m, sizeof(*m));
- buf += sizeof(*m);
-timeout:
- ;
- }
-
- memset(mcelog.entry + prev, 0,
- (next - prev) * sizeof(struct mce));
- prev = next;
- next = cmpxchg(&mcelog.next, prev, 0);
- } while (next != prev);
-
- synchronize_sched();
- /*
- * Collect entries that were still getting written before the
- * synchronize.
- */
- on_each_cpu(collect_tscs, cpu_tsc, 1);
-
- for (i = next; i < MCE_LOG_LEN; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < next; i++) {
struct mce *m = &mcelog.entry[i];
- if (m->finished && m->tsc < cpu_tsc[m->cpu]) {
- err |= copy_to_user(buf, m, sizeof(*m));
- smp_rmb();
- buf += sizeof(*m);
- memset(m, 0, sizeof(*m));
- }
+ err |= copy_to_user(buf, m, sizeof(*m));
+ buf += sizeof(*m);
}
+ memset(mcelog.entry, 0, next * sizeof(struct mce));
+ mcelog.next = 0;
+
if (err)
err = -EFAULT;
out:
mutex_unlock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex);
- kfree(cpu_tsc);
return err ? err : buf - ubuf;
}
--
2.13.0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists