[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <047da0c7-6552-e6bb-d044-7cb5e05c431d@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:58:20 +0000
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Fix ftrace builtin when kernel doesn't have
function_graph
On 01/11/17 16:44, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:33:44 +0000
> Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com> wrote:
>
>> When linux is built without support for function graph tracer, the ftrace
>> builtin of perf will fail when trying to reset max_graph_depth because the
>> file does not exist. This prevents the use of function tracer from perf.
>>
>> Do not attempt to write this file when the tracer in use is not
>> function_graph.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
>> index 25a42ac..48120f2 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
>> @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ static int reset_tracing_files(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused)
>> if (reset_tracing_cpu() < 0)
>> return -1;
>>
>> - if (write_tracing_file("max_graph_depth", "0") < 0)
>> + if (!strcmp(ftrace->tracer, "function_graph") &&
>> + write_tracing_file("max_graph_depth", "0") < 0)
>
> Hmm, instead of doing this, could we just do a stat on the file first.
> As with trace-cmd, I like to reset files like this even when not
> enabling function_graph tracer.
>
Sounds reasonable.
I'll include that change in the next version of the patches.
Thanks,
--
Julien Thierry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists