[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOuPNLjR+3xKoycWc_aYD7e8sh0g-38qQ405A8AN2uCbOOhUBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:44:21 +0530
From: Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@...il.com>
To: shuah@...nel.org
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dvhart@...radead.org,
Bamvor Zhang Jian <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>,
Pintu Kumar <pintu_agarwal@...oo.com>, lkp@...org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [android/ion] 5fb70554d6: kernel_selftests.android.make_fail
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 10:26 AM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2017 04:12 AM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/31/2017 03:21 AM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/30/2017 12:12 AM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 7:51 PM, kernel test robot
>>>>>>>> <xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-6):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> commit: 5fb70554d68e2ea032b6a28b082801d8b7b76cb8 ("android/ion: userspace test utility for ion buffer sharing")
>>>>>>>>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pintu-Agarwal/android-ion-userspace-test-utility-for-ion-buffer-sharing/20171025-022548
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in testcase: kernel_selftests
>>>>>>>>> with following parameters:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel.
>>>>>>>>> test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 64G memory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> KERNEL SELFTESTS: linux_headers_dir is /usr/src/linux-headers-x86_64-rhel-7.2-5fb70554d68e2ea032b6a28b082801d8b7b76cb8
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-26 22:18:16 ln -sf /usr/bin/gcc-5 /usr/bin/gcc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-26 22:18:16 make run_tests -C android
>>>>>>>>> make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.2-5fb70554d68e2ea032b6a28b082801d8b7b76cb8/tools/testing/selftests/android'
>>>>>>>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.2-5fb70554d68e2ea032b6a28b082801d8b7b76cb8/tools/testing/selftests/android/ion'
>>>>>>>>> gcc -I../../../../../drivers/staging/android/uapi/ -Wall -O2 -g ionapp_export.c ipcsocket.c ionutils.c -o ionapp_export
>>>>>>>>> In file included from ionapp_export.c:28:0:
>>>>>>>>> ionutils.h:4:17: fatal error: ion.h: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>> compilation terminated.
>>>>>>>>> In file included from ionutils.c:9:0:
>>>>>>>>> ionutils.h:4:17: fatal error: ion.h: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>> compilation terminated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This utility requires ion.h header file which should be included from
>>>>>>>> kernel source tree: drivers/staging/android/ion/uapi/
>>>>>>>> This is already mentioned in the ion/Makefile
>>>>>>>> Looks like this ion.h is not getting included inside the linux_headers_dir ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shall I include the ion.h locally in my selftests?
>>>>>>>> Or, is there a better way to include the header directly...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't reproduce this in any of my environments but if I had to guess,
>>>>>>> it's because you have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #include "ion.h"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is supposed to look in the local path.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think this is the problem.
>>>>>> It just means, first it will look into the local path, then it will
>>>>>> look into the include path which is specified in the Makefile.
>>>>>> And, in the Makefile I have already included the path where it exists.
>>>>>> INCLUDEDIR := -I../../../../../drivers/staging/android/uapi/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah yeah you are right
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the problem is in general, and not specific to this test.
>>>>>> Because, when I manually try to install the kernel headers, I could
>>>>>> not find the "ion.h" there, or none of the headers from
>>>>>> drivers/staging/android/
>>>>>> # make headers_install ARCH=i386 INSTALL_HDR_PATH=../headers/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, I can see the drivers/android/ header files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now the question is, how to include the header files from staging
>>>>>> folder to kernel headers ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As per reference from some other selftests (such as: gpio/Makefile,
>>>>>> vm/Makefile, etc.), I also tried the following.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ../../../../../drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h:
>>>>>> make -C ../../../../.. headers_install
>>>>>> INSTALL_HDR_PATH=$(shell pwd)/../../../../usr/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this also does not help in installing the ion.h header file in
>>>>>> kernel_header path.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any other pointers to fix this issue ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The staging uapi headers don't look to be installed with the
>>>>> standard install command. This makes sense given that staging
>>>>> drivers are well staging and not yet stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tools/gpio Makefile seems to do this trick to allow compilation
>>>>> outside the kernel tree (it is a dependency for the gpio selftest)
>>>>>
>>>>> #
>>>>> # We need the following to be outside of kernel tree
>>>>> #
>>>>> $(OUTPUT)include/linux/gpio.h: ../../include/uapi/linux/gpio.h
>>>>> mkdir -p $(OUTPUT)include/linux 2>&1 || true
>>>>> ln -sf $(CURDIR)/../../include/uapi/linux/gpio.h $@
>>>>>
>>>>> prepare: $(OUTPUT)include/linux/gpio.h
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tried something similar, but it did not help.
>>>> Or may be I could not understand how to incorporate this into my code
>>>> to make it work.
>>>> Basically, when I do make in gpio, it automatically does this using:
>>>> make -C headers_install.
>>>> But in my case, this command is not getting invoked, using the following:
>>>> ../../../../../drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h:
>>>> make -C ../../../../.. headers_install
>>>> INSTALL_HDR_PATH=$(shell pwd)/../../../../usr/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://kernelnewbies.org/KernelHeaders
>>>> It says:
>>>> [The correct way to address this problem is to isolate the specific
>>>> interfaces that you need, e.g. a single header file that is patched in
>>>> a new kernel providing the ioctl numbers for a character device used
>>>> by your program. In your own program, add a copy of that source file,
>>>> with a notice that it should be kept in sync with new kernel
>>>> versions.]
>>>>
>>>> According to this, it looks like we should maintain the local copy of
>>>> the header file, until it is available.
>>>> I also saw a similar approach in other selftests.
>>>>
>>>> So, for time being shall I create a local copy of ion.h ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry. I am late in responding.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe something like that needs to happen here unless Shuah has
>>>>> any better ideas for headers?
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Since staging headers aren't included in the headers install for good
>>> reasons, I have two suggestions:
>>>
>>> 1. Use bpf as an example:
>>>
>>> You will find a local include/uapi under bpf and the Makefile looks
>>> there first for headers.
>>>
>>> Also, as Greg suggested, please add comments to indicate that this
>>> header needs to be kept in sync with one from staging.
>>>
>>> This does make a copy of the header which isn't great.
>>>
>>> 2. Add a include line in the Makefile directly to point to the uapi
>>>
>>> drivers/staging/android/uapi
>>>
>>> The downside to this approach is if selftests are built outside the
>>> tree, then that would be a problem. However, being able to build selftests
>>> outside the tree requires creating a tarball of the sources first. This
>>> header could be added for that special case.
>>>
>>> I would recommend option 2 to go forward and if that doesn't work, we can
>>> refine it.
>>
>> Thank you for your reply and suggestions.
>> The option 2 is already present, if you see my Makefile.
>> But this option does not work if built outside the kernel source tree.
>> So, I am trying to maintain a local copy of ion.h
>>
>>
>
> So where does the test source reside for outside builds? Is this test hosted
> on GitHub?
>
> I am not opposed to the idea of a local copy. I am trying to understand the
> outside env. that this test needs to be built? I am assuming ion test gets built
> as an independent test and nor from kernel source tree?
>
Sorry, I already pushed the local copy patch. I saw your reply later.
But we can continue our discussion to find more proper solution.
I really don't know about this test robot. I just got this build failure logs.
I tried all cases within the kernel source including the kselftest_install.sh.
I guess, what this tests does is, create kernel_headers inside a
folder, then copy all selftests also
inside this folder and then fire the test one by one.
But I really don't have any idea how it works.
For me also, if I have to test my code outside kernel tree, I usually
copy ion.h header file locally and test it.
But, still I have one question about staging tree kernel headers.
How the kernel headers are created in case of Android where it uses
the ion and other headers heavily?
Thanks,
Pintu
> thaks,
> -- Shuah
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists