[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711011825290.1942@nanos>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:26:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] x86/asm/64: Merge the fast and slow SYSRET paths
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:29:21AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I'm inclined to leave it. I first wrote it without the long name and
> > then I had to re-read the code to make sure I got the register state
> > right. The long name serves as documentation that we need rcx and r11
> > to have special contents. There's only one place that jumps there and
> > it's in the same function.
>
> Frankly, I'd prefer a sane label name and a good comment over it instead
> of insanely long label name which is not as explanatory as a normal
> english sentence or two.
Comments are always appreciated, but in that code really expressive labels
make it way better to follow and prevent accidental wreckage.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists