lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:12:19 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
        michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] x86, kaiser: do not set _PAGE_USER for init_mm page tables

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 02:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> The vsyscall page is _PAGE_USER and lives in init_mm via the fixmap.
>>
>> Groan, forgot about that abomination, but still there is no point in having
>> it marked PAGE_USER in the init_mm at all, kaiser or not.
>
> So shouldn't this patch effectively make the vsyscall page unusable?
> Any idea why that didn't show up in any of the x86 selftests?

I actually think there may be two issues here:

 - vsyscall isn't even used much - if any - any more

 - the vsyscall emulation works fine without _PAGE_USER, since the
whole point is that we take a fault on it and then emulate.

We do expose the vsyscall page read-only to user space in the
emulation case, but I'm not convinced that's even required.

Nobody who configures KAISER enabled would possibly want to have the
actual native vsyscall page enabled. That would be an insane
combination.

So the only possibly difference would be a user mode program that
actually looks at the vsyscall page, which sounds unlikely to be an
issue.  It's legacy and not really used.

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ