lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:12:19 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at, Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>, michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] x86, kaiser: do not set _PAGE_USER for init_mm page tables On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2017 02:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> The vsyscall page is _PAGE_USER and lives in init_mm via the fixmap. >> >> Groan, forgot about that abomination, but still there is no point in having >> it marked PAGE_USER in the init_mm at all, kaiser or not. > > So shouldn't this patch effectively make the vsyscall page unusable? > Any idea why that didn't show up in any of the x86 selftests? I actually think there may be two issues here: - vsyscall isn't even used much - if any - any more - the vsyscall emulation works fine without _PAGE_USER, since the whole point is that we take a fault on it and then emulate. We do expose the vsyscall page read-only to user space in the emulation case, but I'm not convinced that's even required. Nobody who configures KAISER enabled would possibly want to have the actual native vsyscall page enabled. That would be an insane combination. So the only possibly difference would be a user mode program that actually looks at the vsyscall page, which sounds unlikely to be an issue. It's legacy and not really used. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists