linux-kernel - Firmware signing -- Re: [PATCH 00/27] security, efi: Add kernel lockdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14219.1509660259@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:04:19 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        matthew.garrett@...ula.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jforbes@...hat.com
Subject: Firmware signing -- Re: [PATCH 00/27] security, efi: Add kernel lockdown

Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > Only validly signed device firmware may be loaded.
> 
> fw_get_filesystem_firmware() calls kernel_read_file_from_path() to
> read the firmware, which calls into the security hooks. Is there
> another place that validates the firmware signatures.  I'm not seeing
> which patch requires firmware to be signed?

Luis has a set of patches for this.  However, I'm not sure if that's going
anywhere at the moment.  Possibly I should remove this from the manpage for
the moment.

David