lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 15:20:58 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tip tree Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in: drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c between commit: 8776fe75dc0e ("lkdtm, kprobes: Convert from jprobes to kprobes") from the tip tree and commits: 31c5c870a112 ("lkdtm: Convert from jprobe to kprobe") 75f98b7ab748 ("lkdtm: Constify the crashtypes table") from the char-misc tree. [8776fe75dc0e and 31c5c870a112 are the same patch] I fixed it up (I just usted the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists