lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:32:23 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <>
Cc:     linux-clk <>,
        Stephen Warren <>,,
        Michael Turquette <>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Hans de Goede <>,
        Russell King <>,
        Shawn Guo <>,
        Dong Aisheng <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: move of_clk_get_parent_count() declaration to

On 10/29, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-10-13 8:17 GMT+09:00 Stephen Boyd <>:
> >  USB has a
> > similar case, which I think Shawn Guo/Dong Aisheng was trying to
> > add an OF based bulk clk_get() API called of_clk_bulk_get()
> > for[1]. If this get all clks API works there too then we should
> > use it. If it can be non-DT specific, even better.
> >
> > [1]
> OK, we can implement it based on Shawn/Dong's work.
> My concern is clk-bulk.c still needs to include #<linux/clk-provider.h>,
> but it is a bit odd since clk-bulk.c is a helper for clk consumers.

Understood. I'm not concerned though, it's one place where this
happens, not in a bunch of random drivers. What exactly do you
need from clk-provider.h in clk-bulk.c though?

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists