lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 18:52:49 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  include/net/inet_sock.h

between commit:

  60e2a7780793 ("tcp: TCP experimental option for SMC")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  8a3e1a11b8af ("kmemcheck: remove annotations")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/net/inet_sock.h
index 2135c9ba6ac3,21c3e4d73b88..000000000000
--- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
@@@ -92,12 -90,10 +90,11 @@@ struct inet_request_sock 
  				wscale_ok  : 1,
  				ecn_ok	   : 1,
  				acked	   : 1,
 -				no_srccheck: 1;
 +				no_srccheck: 1,
 +				smc_ok	   : 1;
- 	kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags);
  	u32                     ir_mark;
  	union {
 -		struct ip_options_rcu	*opt;
 +		struct ip_options_rcu __rcu	*ireq_opt;
  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
  		struct {
  			struct ipv6_txoptions	*ipv6_opt;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists