[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102093216.GA16369@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 10:32:16 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
'Mathias Nyman' <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> >> > xHCI compatible USB host controllers(i.e. super-speed USB3 controllers)
> >> > can be implemented with the Debug Capability(DbC). It presents a debug
> >> > device which is fully compliant with the USB framework and provides the
> >> > equivalent of a very high performance full-duplex serial link. The debug
> >> > capability operation model and registers interface are defined in 7.6.8
> >> > of the xHCI specification, revision 1.1.
> >> >
> >> > The DbC debug device shares a root port with the xHCI host. By default,
> >> > the debug capability is disabled and the root port is assigned to xHCI.
> >> > When the DbC is enabled, the root port will be assigned to the DbC debug
> >> > device, and the xHCI sees nothing on this port. This implementation uses
> >> > a sysfs node named <dbc> under the xHCI device to manage the enabling
> >> > and disabling of the debug capability.
> >> >
> >> > When the debug capability is enabled, it will present a debug device
> >> > through the debug port. This debug device is fully compliant with the
> >> > USB3 framework, and it can be enumerated by a debug host on the other
> >> > end of the USB link. As soon as the debug device is configured, a TTY
> >> > serial device named /dev/ttyDBC0 will be created.
> >> >
> >> > One use of this link is running a login service on the debug target.
> >> > Hence it can be remote accessed by a debug host. Another use case can
> >> > probably be found in servers. It provides a peer-to-peer USB link
> >> > between two host-only machines. This provides a reasonable out-of-band
> >> > communication method between two servers.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci-drivers-xhci_hcd | 25 +
> >> > drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 9 +
> >> > drivers/usb/host/Makefile | 5 +
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c | 1016 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h | 247 +++++
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c | 586 +++++++++++
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-trace.h | 60 ++
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 10 +
> >> > drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 1 +
> >> > 9 files changed, 1959 insertions(+)
> >> > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci-drivers-xhci_hcd
> >> > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c
> >> > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h
> >> > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
> >> >
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> > +#define DBC_VENDOR_ID 0x1d6b /* Linux Foundation 0x1d6b */
> >> > +#define DBC_PRODUCT_ID 0x0004 /* device 0004 */
> >> >
> >>
> >> The DbC (xHCI DeBug Capability) is an optional functionality in
> >> some xHCI host controllers. It will present a super-speed debug
> >> device through the debug port after it is enabled.
> >>
> >> The DbC register set defines an interface for system software
> >> to specify the vendor id and product id of the debug device.
> >> These two values will be presented by the debug device in its
> >> device descriptor idVendor and idProduct fields.
> >>
> >> Microsoft Windows have a well established protocol for
> >> debugging over DbC. And it assigns below values for its use.
> >>
> >> USB\VID_045E&PID_062D.DeviceDesc="Microsoft USB Debug Target"
> >>
> >> I'm going to use 0x1d6b/0x0004 value pair for DbC use in
> >> Linux. Do you approve me to do so?
> >
> > No. Why can't you use the same ids as Windows? This is implementing
> > the same protocol, right?
>
> the protocol running on top is 100% vendor specific. More than likely,
> we would just run kgdb on top of this, right? We really don't support
> microsoft's debug architecture.
Ah, I didn't know about the protocol specifics here, if it is
vendor-specific, then yes, we need our own id.
As the above text said "well established protocol", I assumed we
implemented the same thing :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists