lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711021220150.2090@nanos>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:21:10 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
        michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] x86, kaiser: do not set _PAGE_USER for init_mm
 page tables

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> init_mm is for kernel-exclusive use.  If someone is allocating page
> >> >> tables in it, do not set _PAGE_USER on them.  This ensures that
> >> >> we do *not* set NX on these page tables in the KAISER code.
> >> >
> >> > This changelog is confusing at best.
> >> >
> >> > Why is this a kaiser issue? Nothing should ever create _PAGE_USER entries
> >> > in init_mm, right?
> >>
> >> The vsyscall page is _PAGE_USER and lives in init_mm via the fixmap.
> >
> > Groan, forgot about that abomination, but still there is no point in having
> > it marked PAGE_USER in the init_mm at all, kaiser or not.
> >
> 
> How can it be PAGE_USER in user mms but not init_mm?  It's the same page table.

Right you are. Brain was already shutdown it seems.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ