linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid race in between GC and block exchange

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171102124104.75298-4-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:41:04 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid race in between GC and block exchange

During block exchange in {insert,collapse,move}_range, page-block mapping
is unstable due to mapping moving or recovery, so there should be no
concurrent cache read operation rely on such mapping, nor cache write
operation to mess up block exchange.

So this patch let background GC be aware of that.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 0e09b9f02dc5..21ae4faa7c58 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -1186,6 +1186,9 @@ static int f2fs_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	/* avoid gc operation during block exchange */
+	down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
+
 	truncate_pagecache(inode, offset);
 
 	ret = f2fs_do_collapse(inode, pg_start, pg_end);
@@ -1204,6 +1207,7 @@ static int f2fs_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 		f2fs_i_size_write(inode, new_size);
 
 out:
+	up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 	up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1385,6 +1389,9 @@ static int f2fs_insert_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	/* avoid gc operation during block exchange */
+	down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
+
 	truncate_pagecache(inode, offset);
 
 	pg_start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -1412,6 +1419,8 @@ static int f2fs_insert_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 
 	if (!ret)
 		f2fs_i_size_write(inode, new_size);
+
+	up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 out:
 	up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
 	return ret;
@@ -2274,9 +2283,13 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 	}
 
 	inode_lock(src);
+	down_write(&F2FS_I(src)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 	if (src != dst) {
-		if (!inode_trylock(dst)) {
-			ret = -EBUSY;
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		if (!inode_trylock(dst))
+			goto out;
+		if (!down_write_trylock(&F2FS_I(dst)->dio_rwsem[WRITE])) {
+			inode_unlock(dst);
 			goto out;
 		}
 	}
@@ -2336,9 +2349,12 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 	}
 	f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
 out_unlock:
-	if (src != dst)
+	if (src != dst) {
+		up_write(&F2FS_I(dst)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 		inode_unlock(dst);
+	}
 out:
+	up_write(&F2FS_I(src)->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 	inode_unlock(src);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.13.1.388.g69e6b9b4f4a9