lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:05 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
Cc:     vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        rafal@...ecki.pl, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Define eth_stp_addr in linux/etherdevice.h

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
> Why:

Please drop the Why.

> The lan9303 driver defines eth_stp_addr as a synonym to
> eth_reserved_addr_base to get the STP ethernet address 01:80:c2:00:00:00.
> 
> eth_reserved_addr_base is also used to define the start of Bridge Reserved
> ethernet address range, which happen to be the STP address.
> 
> br_dev_setup refer to eth_reserved_addr_base as a definition of STP
> address.
> 
> Clean up by:
>  - Move the eth_stp_addr definition to linux/etherdevice.h
>  - Use eth_stp_addr instead of eth_reserved_addr_base in br_dev_setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>

I was thinking along the same lines when reviewing your lan9303 patch.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists