linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: NOMMU: work around maybe-uninitialized warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:47:37 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
        afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NOMMU: work around maybe-uninitialized warning

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:11:23PM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 02/11/17 13:07, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I'd prefer not to at this stage.  Same things that apply that I said
> > in the "ARM: early_printk: use printascii() rather than printch()"
> > thread - I need to ensure that what I have is stable before 4.14 is
> > released, so I'm not accepting anything further unless it is _really_
> > urgent.
> 
> Yes, I saw that thread, it is why that "not sure" thing.
> 
> > 
> > This isn't urgent.
> > 
> 
> Should I resubmit after -rc1 or you'll apply it directly from patch tracker?

If you put it in the patch tracker now, I'll apply it when appropriate.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up