[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171102152438.25324-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 23:24:35 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 4/7] blk-flush: use blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()
In the following patch, we will use RQF_FLUSH_SEQ to decide:
1) if the flag isn't set, the flush rq need to be inserted via
blk_insert_flush()
2) otherwise, the flush rq need to be dispatched directly since
it is in flush machinery now.
So we use blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() for requests of bypassing
flush machinery, just like what the legacy path did.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
---
block/blk-flush.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 81bd1a843043..a9773d2075ac 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
if (q->mq_ops)
- blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, false, false, false);
+ blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false);
else
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->queue_head);
return;
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists