[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102165813.mfeo35s5rscspdtz@redbean>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:58:14 +0100
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipmi tree with the modules tree
+++ Corey Minyard [02/11/17 11:40 -0500]:
>On 11/02/2017 09:27 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>+++ Corey Minyard [02/11/17 08:31 -0500]:
>>>On 11/01/2017 10:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>Hi Corey,
>>>>
>>>>Today's linux-next merge of the ipmi tree got a conflict in:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>>>
>>>>between commit:
>>>>
>>>> e4dca7b7aa08 ("treewide: Fix function prototypes for
>>>>module_param_call()")
>>>>
>>>>from the modules tree and commit:
>>>>
>>>> 44814ec982d2 ("ipmi_si: Move the hotmod handling to another file.")
>>>>
>>>>from the ipmi tree.
>>>
>>>Thanks Stephen.
>>>
>>>Kees, do you have a tree I can merge so we can avoid this going
>>>upstream?
>>
>>Hi Corey,
>>
>>the modules-next tree (with the conflicting commit) is found here:
>>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeyu/linux.git#modules-next
>>
>
>Hi Jessica,
>
>I merged this into the ipmi for-next tree, so we should be good now,
>assuming I did this right.
Thanks Corey!
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists