lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:58:14 +0100
From:   Jessica Yu <>
To:     Corey Minyard <>
Cc:     Corey Minyard <>,
        Kees Cook <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipmi tree with the modules tree

+++ Corey Minyard [02/11/17 11:40 -0500]:
>On 11/02/2017 09:27 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>+++ Corey Minyard [02/11/17 08:31 -0500]:
>>>On 11/01/2017 10:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>Hi Corey,
>>>>Today's linux-next merge of the ipmi tree got a conflict in:
>>>>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>>>between commit:
>>>>  e4dca7b7aa08 ("treewide: Fix function prototypes for 
>>>>from the modules tree and commit:
>>>>  44814ec982d2 ("ipmi_si: Move the hotmod handling to another file.")
>>>>from the ipmi tree.
>>>Thanks Stephen.
>>>Kees, do you have a tree I can merge so we can avoid this going 
>>Hi Corey,
>>the modules-next tree (with the conflicting commit) is found here:
>Hi Jessica,
>I merged this into the ipmi for-next tree, so we should be good now,
>assuming I did this right.

Thanks Corey!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists