[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102185122.GA6817@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:51:22 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 0c1ec68..ed94ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
case XenbusStateClosed:
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
break;
- /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
+ /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
+ /* fall through */
case XenbusStateClosing:
xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
break;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists