[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102185939.xxyu6quthqpe5xfh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 19:59:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/core: add PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE_SKID_IP record
type
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 874b71a70058..772530501025 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
> u64 stack_user_size;
>
> u64 phys_addr;
> + u64 skid_ip;
> } ____cacheline_aligned;
>
> /* default value for data source */
> @@ -937,6 +938,7 @@ static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
> data->weight = 0;
> data->data_src.val = PERF_MEM_NA;
> data->txn = 0;
> + data->skid_ip = 0; /* mark as uinitialized */
> }
I keep forgetting to write the comment explaining how this function only
touches a single cacheline; you just wrecked that :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists