[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102192509.GA19908@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:25:09 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: alim1535_wdt: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c
index 3a17fbd..60f0c2e 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c
@@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ static long ali_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
if (ali_settimer(new_timeout))
return -EINVAL;
ali_keepalive();
- /* Fall */
}
+ /* fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(timeout, p);
default:
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists