lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>   .activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate,
>               ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
>   dbe776c2ca54 ("gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver")
>
> interacting with commit
>
>   72491643469a ("genirq/irqdomain: Update irq_domain_ops.activate() signature")
>
> from the tip tree
>
> I added the following merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:10:46 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: uniphier: merge fix for "Update
>  irq_domain_ops.activate() signature"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
to do at this point.

I suspect the IRQ infrastructure will be pulled to Torvald's tree
first anyway.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists