[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY0rOxacH=kymWanruEgUcSsfXhy3CrogVUqg9WT_bjTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> .activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate,
> ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> dbe776c2ca54 ("gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 72491643469a ("genirq/irqdomain: Update irq_domain_ops.activate() signature")
>
> from the tip tree
>
> I added the following merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:10:46 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: uniphier: merge fix for "Update
> irq_domain_ops.activate() signature"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
to do at this point.
I suspect the IRQ infrastructure will be pulled to Torvald's tree
first anyway.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists