[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-L7v-KQQ5SZ9yVUiqPcaNCn5XbwcPrPHXnGO_tDv6_UgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:56:15 +0900
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] tun: add eBPF based queue selection method
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces an eBPF based queue selection method based on
> the flow steering policy ops. Userspace could load an eBPF program
> through TUNSETSTEERINGEBPF. This gives much more flexibility compare
> to simple but hard coded policy in kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> +static int tun_set_steering_ebpf(struct tun_struct *tun, void __user *data)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + u32 fd;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&fd, data, sizeof(fd)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + prog = bpf_prog_get_type(fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER);
If the idea is to allow guests to pass BPF programs down to the host,
you may want to define a new program type that is more restrictive than
socket filter.
The external functions allowed for socket filters (sk_filter_func_proto)
are relatively few (compared to, say, clsact), but may still leak host
information to a guest. More importantly, guest security considerations
limits how we can extend socket filters later.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists