linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: lan9303: Remove unnecessary parentheses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32ae5cf5-ed19-106c-2625-b53074e00282@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:35:41 +0100
From:   Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: lan9303: Remove unnecessary
 parentheses

On 03. nov. 2017 15:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 11:55 +0100, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
>> Remove scripts/checkpatch.pl CHECKs by remove unnecessary parentheses
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> []
>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int lan9303_detect_phy_setup(struct lan9303 *chip)
>>   		return reg;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if ((reg != 0) && (reg != 0xffff))
>> +	if (reg != 0 && reg != 0xffff)
>>   		chip->phy_addr_sel_strap = 1;
>>   	else
>>   		chip->phy_addr_sel_strap = 0;
> 
> phy_addr_sel_strap is currently bool.
> 
> If this is to be changed, it should be set
> true or false.
> 
> My preference would be:
> 
> 	chip->phy_addr_sel_strap = (reg != 0 && reg != 0xffff);
> 
> But perhaps its bool type should be converted
> to int as this phy_addr_sel_strap is used as
> int several times.
> 

Hi Joe

I had not noticed that phy_addr_sel_strap is bool. I agree that is
misleading. Your suggestion is perhaps a bit "magic", but on the other
hand the magic is explained well in the comment above.

If there are no disagreements, I can do a v2 with that.

And thanks for teaching me about "git grep"!

Cheers
Egil