[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171103151228.GS11011@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:12:28 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/22] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI
On 11/02, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 02/11/17 07:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Is there a lot of copy/paste going on from clk-scpi.c? Maybe it
> > could be consolidated?
> >
>
> Not much apart from the usual driver skeleton. Also SCPI specification
> will not be enhanced any further while SCMI will be. So they will
> deviated in the feature set going further. Even I was thinking of
> merging then together initially but based on some WIP changes to the
> specification, I thought it may not be good idea. But if we think it can
> be merged in future , I will do that for sure(for easy maintenance)
>
Ok, no worries from me. Thanks for taking another look.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists