[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1509722197.15520.17.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:16:37 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>
Cc: sagi@...mberg.me, keith.busch@...el.com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Javier González <javier@...xlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: fix eui_show() print format
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier González wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Javier González <javier@...xlabs.com>
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
[]
> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > char *buf)
> > {
> > struct nvme_ns *ns = nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev);
> > - return sprintf(buf, "%8phd\n", ns->eui);
> > + return sprintf(buf, "%8phD\n", ns->eui);
> > }
> > static DEVICE_ATTR(eui, S_IRUGO, eui_show, NULL);
>
> This looks correct. I wonder what the old code printed - does someone
> have a device with an EUI-64 at hand to quickly cross check what we
> did before?
It uses spaces between bytes and not dashes.
The code has been this way a couple years now.
I think this proposal, while it might fix an
unintentional output style, could also be an API
and could cause user breakage if changed.
Perhaps this should just become
%8ph
without D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists