[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1509722870-27618-2-git-send-email-tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:27:50 +0200
From: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@...il.com>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tal.shorer@...il.com,
frederic@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] workqueue: respect isolated cpus when queueing an unbound work
Initialize wq_unbound_cpumask to exclude cpus that were isolated by
the cmdline's isolcpus parameter.
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@...il.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 64d0edf..a355e9d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
#include "workqueue_internal.h"
@@ -4980,6 +4981,10 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&saved_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
+ /*
+ * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose.
+ * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that.
+ */
cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
apply_wqattrs_lock();
@@ -5579,7 +5584,7 @@ int __init workqueue_init_early(void)
WARN_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long));
BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL));
- cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
+ cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));
pwq_cache = KMEM_CACHE(pool_workqueue, SLAB_PANIC);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists