[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1255476707.35881664.1509725585691.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:13:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, nyc@...omorphy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] shmem: add sealing support to hugetlb-backed memfd
Hi
----- Original Message -----
> On 10/31/2017 11:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Adapt add_seals()/get_seals() to work with hugetbfs-backed memory.
> >
> > Teach memfd_create() to allow sealing operations on MFD_HUGETLB.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/shmem.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> > index b7811979611f..b7c59d993c19 100644
> > --- a/mm/shmem.c
> > +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> > @@ -2717,6 +2717,19 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space
> > *mapping)
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned int *memfd_get_seals(struct file *file)
>
> I would have named this something like 'memfd_file_seal_ptr', and not
> changed the name of memfd_get_seals below. Just my preference, and it
> does not carry as much weight as Hugh who originally write this code.
>
agreed and changed, thanks
> > +{
> > + if (file->f_op == &shmem_file_operations)
> > + return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
> > + if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations)
> > + return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
>
> As mentioned in patch 2, I think this code will need to be restructured
> so that hugetlbfs file sealing will work even is CONFIG_TMPFS is not
> defined. The above routine is behind #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS.
>
> In general the code looks fine, but this config issue needs to be addressed.
See discussion in patch 2
> --
> Mike Kravetz
>
> > #define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \
> > F_SEAL_SHRINK | \
> > F_SEAL_GROW | \
> > @@ -2725,7 +2738,7 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space
> > *mapping)
> > static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals)
> > {
> > struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > - struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> > + unsigned int *file_seals;
> > int error;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2758,8 +2771,6 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file,
> > unsigned int seals)
> > * other file types.
> > */
> >
> > - if (file->f_op != &shmem_file_operations)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> > return -EPERM;
> > if (seals & ~(unsigned int)F_ALL_SEALS)
> > @@ -2767,12 +2778,18 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file,
> > unsigned int seals)
> >
> > inode_lock(inode);
> >
> > - if (info->seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) {
> > + file_seals = memfd_get_seals(file);
> > + if (!file_seals) {
> > + error = -EINVAL;
> > + goto unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (*file_seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) {
> > error = -EPERM;
> > goto unlock;
> > }
> >
> > - if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) {
> > + if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) {
> > error = mapping_deny_writable(file->f_mapping);
> > if (error)
> > goto unlock;
> > @@ -2784,7 +2801,7 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file,
> > unsigned int seals)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - info->seals |= seals;
> > + *file_seals |= seals;
> > error = 0;
> >
> > unlock:
> > @@ -2792,12 +2809,11 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file,
> > unsigned int seals)
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > -static int memfd_get_seals(struct file *file)
> > +static int memfd_fcntl_get_seals(struct file *file)
> > {
> > - if (file->f_op != &shmem_file_operations)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + unsigned int *seals = memfd_get_seals(file);
> >
> > - return SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
> > + return seals ? *seals : -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > @@ -2813,7 +2829,7 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > error = memfd_add_seals(file, arg);
> > break;
> > case F_GET_SEALS:
> > - error = memfd_get_seals(file);
> > + error = memfd_fcntl_get_seals(file);
> > break;
> > default:
> > error = -EINVAL;
> > @@ -3657,7 +3673,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create,
> > const char __user *, uname,
> > unsigned int, flags)
> > {
> > - struct shmem_inode_info *info;
> > + unsigned int *file_seals;
> > struct file *file;
> > int fd, error;
> > char *name;
> > @@ -3667,9 +3683,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create,
> > if (flags & ~(unsigned int)MFD_ALL_FLAGS)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > } else {
> > - /* Sealing not supported in hugetlbfs (MFD_HUGETLB) */
> > - if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > /* Allow huge page size encoding in flags. */
> > if (flags & ~(unsigned int)(MFD_ALL_FLAGS |
> > (MFD_HUGE_MASK << MFD_HUGE_SHIFT)))
> > @@ -3722,12 +3735,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create,
> > file->f_flags |= O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE;
> >
> > if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) {
> > - /*
> > - * flags check at beginning of function ensures
> > - * this is not a hugetlbfs (MFD_HUGETLB) file.
> > - */
> > - info = SHMEM_I(file_inode(file));
> > - info->seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL;
> > + file_seals = memfd_get_seals(file);
> > + *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL;
> > }
> >
> > fd_install(fd, file);
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists