[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1509728692-10460-8-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:04:46 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v16 07/13] Add task isolation hooks to arch-independent code
This commit adds task isolation hooks as follows:
- __handle_domain_irq() generates an isolation warning for the
local task
- irq_work_queue_on() generates an isolation warning for the remote
task being interrupted for irq_work
- generic_exec_single() generates a remote isolation warning for
the remote cpu being IPI'd
- smp_call_function_many() generates a remote isolation warning for
the set of remote cpus being IPI'd
Calls to task_isolation_remote() or task_isolation_interrupt() can
be placed in the platform-independent code like this when doing so
results in fewer lines of code changes, as for example is true of
the users of the arch_send_call_function_*() APIs. Or, they can
be placed in the per-architecture code when there are many callers,
as for example is true of the smp_send_reschedule() call.
A further cleanup might be to create an intermediate layer, so that
for example smp_send_reschedule() is a single generic function that
just calls arch_smp_send_reschedule(), allowing generic code to be
called every time smp_send_reschedule() is invoked. But for now,
we just update either callers or callees as makes most sense.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
---
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 5 +++++
kernel/irq_work.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index 82afb7ed369f..1b114c6b7ab8 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
#include "internals.h"
@@ -633,6 +634,10 @@ int __handle_domain_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int hwirq,
irq = irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq);
#endif
+ task_isolation_interrupt((irq == hwirq) ?
+ "irq %d (%s)" : "irq %d (%s hwirq %d)",
+ irq, domain ? domain->name : "", hwirq);
+
/*
* Some hardware gives randomly wrong interrupts. Rather
* than crashing, do something sensible.
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index bcf107ce0854..cde49f1f31f7 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -75,8 +76,10 @@ bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
if (!irq_work_claim(work))
return false;
- if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu)))
+ if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu))) {
+ task_isolation_remote(cpu, "irq_work");
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
+ }
return true;
}
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index c94dd85c8d41..44252aa650ac 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/idle.h>
#include <linux/hypervisor.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
#include "smpboot.h"
@@ -175,8 +176,10 @@ static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd,
* locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
* equipped to do the right thing...
*/
- if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
+ if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu))) {
+ task_isolation_remote(cpu, "IPI function");
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -458,6 +461,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
}
/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
+ task_isolation_remote_cpumask(cfd->cpumask_ipi, "IPI function");
arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
if (wait) {
--
2.1.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists