lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:23:16 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Francis Giraldeau <francis.giraldeau@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 10/13] arch/arm: enable task isolation functionality

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:04:49PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> From: Francis Giraldeau <francis.giraldeau@...il.com>
> 
> This patch is a port of the task isolation functionality to the arm 32-bit
> architecture. The task isolation needs an additional thread flag that
> requires to change the entry assembly code to accept a bitfield larger than
> one byte.  The constants _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK and _TIF_WORK_MASK are now
> defined in the literal pool. The rest of the patch is straightforward and
> reflects what is done on other architectures.
> 
> To avoid problems with the tst instruction in the v7m build, we renumber
> TIF_SECCOMP to bit 8 and let TIF_TASK_ISOLATION use bit 7.

After a bit of digging (which could've been saved if our patch format
contained information about what kernel version this patch was
generated against) it turns out that this patch will not apply since
commit 73ac5d6a2b6ac ("arm/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode
return") has been applied, which means the TIF numbers have changed
as well as the assembly code that your patch touches.

My guess is that this patch was generated from a 4.13 kernel, so
misses the 4.14-rc1 changes.  Since we're potentially about to start
the merge window for 4.15 this weekend, the timing of this doesn't
work well either.

Once 4.15-rc1 has been published, please rebase against that version
and resend.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists