lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=5CCMAA9n7=ocPO5UYmCmkNs8GLYrxXVZVZEeYCyisyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:11:45 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
ently compile
> What's the minimum set of patches necessary to work with clang (ignoring
> LTO)?

If you have a build of clang-5, then just patch 7 in this series to
work around the last compiler bug.  If you build clang from source
from master, ToT, for arm64, then none. :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ