[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171103184227.GC21036@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 19:42:27 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: security@...nel.org, Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] protect the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE tasks from
!sig_kernel_only() signals
Change sig_task_ignored() to drop the SIG_DFL && !sig_kernel_only()
signals even if force == T. This simplifies the next change and this
matches the same check in get_signal() which will drop these signals
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index b9aebe1..8fc0182 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
- handler == SIG_DFL && !force)
+ handler == SIG_DFL && !(force && sig_kernel_only(sig)))
return 1;
return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists