[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ+tvhq4X19LTb9tjE4v0J1qaTh-EtVOER3GmQw5xHN0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:40:23 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
>> to do at this point.
>
> Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree
> without merging in part of the tip tree (it will generate, at least,
> warnings in your build testing of your tree) ...
OK I take it out again...
>> I suspect the IRQ infrastructure will be pulled to Torvald's tree
>> first anyway.
>
> You just need to let Linus know that this update is require (maybe
> provide him with my merge fix patch) when you send your pull request.
OK I will try to do that.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists