linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     陈华才 <chenhc@...ote.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        JamesHogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        "James E . J .Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan@...ibm.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
        "Mark A . Greer" <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
        RobertBaldyga <r.baldyga@...kerion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()

I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for
the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well.

But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front
without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be
merged to stable.