lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8bd3b8b-190a-6dbf-6976-207baca3030b@suse.de>
Date:   Sat, 4 Nov 2017 16:43:31 +0800
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        mchehab@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        daniel.thompson@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        liuwei@...ions-semi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: actions: add s900 clock controller nodes

Am 01.11.2017 um 03:54 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> This patch adds clock controller nodes for Actions Semi s900 SoC

Please avoid "This patch". Once applied, it's a commit. :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
> index 11406f6..c099ef1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/actions,s900-clock.h>

Alphabetical order please.

>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "actions,s900";
> @@ -88,6 +89,24 @@
>  		#clock-cells = <0>;
>  	};
>  
> +	losc: losc {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <32768>;
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	diff_24M: diff_24M {

No underscore in node names please - maybe diff-24M or simpler diff24M?
Please double-check that name - is it from manual or from schematics?

> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	clock: clock-controller@...60000 {
> +		compatible = "actions,s900-clock";
> +		reg = <0 0xe0160000 0 0x1000>;
> +		#clock-cells = <1>;
> +	};

This node belongs into the soc node below, ordered by unit address.
And maybe there's a better label than "clock"? "clkc" or some official
name from the manual?

> +
>  	soc {
>  		compatible = "simple-bus";
>  		#address-cells = <2>;

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ