[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171105125419.p2ce2yl4nfi6lfcl@ninjato>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 13:54:19 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Kalyan Kinthada <kalyan.kinthada@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
jason@...edaemon.net, andrew@...n.ch,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Update documentation for
"mv78230-a0-i2c"
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 06:29:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:23:43PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > > Hi Wolfram,
> > >
> > > On ven., sept. 29 2017, Kalyan Kinthada <kalyan.kinthada@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This commit modifies the documentation for
> > > > "marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c" compatible string.
> > > >
> > > > The "marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c" compatible string enables the workaround
> > > > for an i2c repeated start timing violation, but unlike
> > > > "marvell,mv78230-i2c" it disables the i2c offload support. This is
> > > > applicable to a number of SoCs such as early revisions of the Armada XP
> > > > and the Armada 38x.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kalyan Kinthada <kalyan.kinthada@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> > >
> > >
> > > I applied the dt fix on my mvebu/fixes branch. Do you want to apply this
> > > one on your branch, or do you prefer I take it. In this case an acked-by
> > > would be nice.
> >
> > I'd prefer to take it. What I'd really like to see here is an ack from
> > Rob because of the previous discussion of an earlier revision of this
> > patch.
>
> I'm confused how mv78230 relates to Armada XP or 38x... I don't really
> want to know either. If normal compatible string conventions were
> followed then I wouldn't have to.
Is this a NAK or "annoyed, but don't really care"? ;)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists