[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171105151335.GA27113@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:13:35 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: watchdog: wdt_pci: mark expected switch fall-through
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:07:23PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c b/drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c
> index bc7addc..10e2cda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static long wdtpci_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> if (wdtpci_set_heartbeat(new_heartbeat))
> return -EINVAL;
> wdtpci_ping();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(heartbeat, p);
> default:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists