linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171105215344.a5nyk7xmcdl22tpd@ninjato>
Date:   Sun, 5 Nov 2017 22:53:44 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:49:48PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
> 
> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
> 
> To maintain backward compatibility with old Device Trees, only use the OF
> device ID table .data if the device was registered via OF and the OF node
> compatible matches an entry in the OF device ID table.
> 
> Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
> 

Applied to for-next, thanks for keeping at it!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)