[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171105093752.6e5hj777jbg7rr2b@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 10:37:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: changbin.du@...el.com
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, kbuild: Some improvements for fdimage/isoimage
generation
* changbin.du@...el.com <changbin.du@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
>
> This serias is a expansion of below original patch after discussion with Ingo
> and Yamada.
> [PATCH] x86, build: Improve the isolinux searching of isoimage generation
>
> Changbin Du (4):
> x86, build: Fact out fdimage/isoimage generation commands to
> standalone script
> x86, build: Add new paths for isolinux.bin and ldlinux.c32
> x86, build: Specify -input-charset=utf-8 for mkisofs
> x86, boot: Add some generated files to the .gitignore file
>
> arch/x86/boot/.gitignore | 3 ++
> arch/x86/boot/Makefile | 59 +++++------------------
> arch/x86/boot/genimage.sh | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/genimage.sh
Very nice - it looks good to me with the edits I suggested.
Would be nice if the kbuild maintainers could take a look as well - is this how
boot image construction should be done at the arch level?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists