[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171105102942.GA31503@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 11:29:42 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@...e.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: require CAP_SYS_ADMIN to write to procfs
interface
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 08:11:20PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> I've booted it on a few of my laptops, and nothing seemed to break. Is
> there a particular test-suite you'd recommend that I run?
Workloads/tools that normally interact with this file would be the best
ones, right? Odds are, your normal "laptop booting/running" mode does
not do anything with this file.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists