[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1510009387.187195218@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:03:07 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 085/147] packet: in packet_do_bind, test fanout with
bind_lock held
3.2.95-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
commit 4971613c1639d8e5f102c4e797c3bf8f83a5a69e upstream.
Once a socket has po->fanout set, it remains a member of the group
until it is destroyed. The prot_hook must be constant and identical
across sockets in the group.
If fanout_add races with packet_do_bind between the test of po->fanout
and taking the lock, the bind call may make type or dev inconsistent
with that of the fanout group.
Hold po->bind_lock when testing po->fanout to avoid this race.
I had to introduce artificial delay (local_bh_enable) to actually
observe the race.
Fixes: dc99f600698d ("packet: Add fanout support.")
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -2483,14 +2483,16 @@ static int packet_do_bind(struct sock *s
int ret = 0;
bool unlisted = false;
- if (po->fanout)
- return -EINVAL;
-
lock_sock(sk);
spin_lock(&po->bind_lock);
rcu_read_lock();
+ if (po->fanout) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
if (name) {
dev = dev_get_by_name_rcu(sock_net(sk), name);
if (!dev) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists