[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171106234520.GA24984@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 15:45:20 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
syzbot
<bot+f99f3a0db9007f4f4e32db54229a240c4fe57c15@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jlayton@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
npiggin@...il.com, rgoldwyn@...e.com, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in generic_file_write_iter
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:36:25AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> How about complete_nodep() as name? Otherwise this looks ok to me - not
> pretty, but not _that_ horrible either..
I read that as node-p, not no-dep. complete_nocheck()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists